Drafting DBE Personal Narratives for Recertification: Learning Lessons from the SBA 8(a) Program

As Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) begin navigating the new recertification process requiring individualized showings of social and economic disadvantage, one pressing challenge stands out: there is not yet meaningful data on what narratives succeed or fail under the revised DBE framework.

DBEs in States like Ohio, Georgia, Minnesota, Arizona and others are working to get their recertification applications submitted, but with little guidance out there many feel unsure of what qualifies as disadvantaged under the new rules.  While other states like New Jersey, New York and Iowa are facing impending deadlines and are racing to comply.

With the U.S. Department of Transportation’s recent shift away from presumptions, DBEs are being asked to do something many have never done before—personally prove disadvantage through detailed narratives and supporting evidence. Because certifying agencies are still building experience under this new standard, DBEs understandably ask: What are certifiers actually going to look for?

In the absence of DBE‑specific outcomes, the best available guidance comes from a closely related program that has long used an individualized disadvantage analysis: the SBA’s 8(a) Business Development Program. SBA’s public training materials and denial examples provide a valuable window into how government certifiers analyze Personal Narratives—and why they reject them.

This article explains what DBEs undergoing recertification can learn from those 8(a) examples, and how to draft narratives that anticipate certifier scrutiny.


Why the 8(a) Program Is the Right Reference Point—for Now

Although DBE and 8(a) programs are governed by different regulations, they share a critical feature: both require applicants to prove social disadvantage through specific, individualized evidence, evaluated under a “more likely than not” standard.

Because SBA has applied this analytical framework for decades—and has documented common deficiencies in Personal Narratives—its examples are the closest proxy available for how DOT certifiers are likely to approach DBE recertification narratives in practice.

Until DBE recertification decisions under the new rules become public and systematic patterns emerge, 8(a) denials offer a cautionary roadmap of what not to do.


What Certifiers Are Really Evaluating in a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Personal Narrative

One of the most common misconceptions among DBEs is that a Personal Narrative is primarily a storytelling exercise. In reality, certifiers treat it as evidentiary analysis, not autobiography.

Across both programs, certifiers focus on four core questions:

  1. Was there a specific instance of bias or discriminatory conduct?
  2. Was that conduct tied to the applicant’s protected characteristic?
  3. Did it negatively affect education, employment, or business development?
  4. Is it more likely than not that the outcome resulted from discrimination rather than neutral factors?

If any of these elements are missing—or inadequately supported—the narrative is likely to fail.


Example 1: Alleged Pay Disparity Without Comparative Detail

Claim presented:
An applicant stated she was paid less than a male counterpart while employed by the same company.

Why SBA found the narrative insufficient:
The applicant did not identify whether her education, experience, tenure, or job responsibilities were equal to—or greater than—those of the male comparator. Without this context, SBA concluded that the pay difference could just as easily be explained by legitimate, non‑discriminatory reasons such as seniority or different job duties.pdf).pdf).pdf). [PN Course Deck (2) | PDF]

Lesson for DBE recertification:
Simply identifying a negative outcome (such as lower pay or lost opportunity) is not enough. DBEs must rule out alternative explanations by presenting detailed comparisons to similarly situated individuals.

Certifiers are trained to ask: Why is discrimination the most likely explanation here?


Example 2: Denied Opportunities Without Proof of Differential Treatment

Claim presented:
An applicant asserted she was denied permission to attend a professional development conference, while male coworkers were allowed to attend similar events.

Why SBA rejected the claim:
The narrative did not establish that the applicant:

  • Occupied a similar role and level as those who were approved
  • Requested attendance during a time when funding was available
  • Was treated differently because of gender rather than budgetary or operational reasons.pdf).pdf). [PN Course Deck (2) | PDF]

Lesson for DBE recertification:
DBE narratives must demonstrate situational parity. Certifiers will not assume differential treatment unless the applicant proves that they were similarly situated in all material respects.

Statements such as “others were allowed but I was not” must be backed by facts showing equivalence in role, timing, and qualifications.


Example 3: Discriminatory Conduct Without Business Impact

Claim presented:
An applicant described clients making derogatory, gender‑based remarks during business interactions.

Why SBA denied the claim:
Despite recognizing the remarks as discriminatory, SBA found that the applicant continued to receive contracts and maintain business relationships with those same clients. Because the conduct did not produce an adverse effect on business development, it did not establish social disadvantage under the program’s standard.

Lesson for DBE recertification:
Discrimination alone is insufficient. Certifiers are required to find material impact, such as lost revenue, reduced opportunities, delayed growth, or constrained access to capital.

DBEs must connect conduct to outcome—not merely offense to experience.


Common Narrative Pitfalls DBEs Should Avoid With Personal Narratives

Drawing from SBA’s long‑standing analysis of Personal Narratives, the following weaknesses repeatedly lead to denial and are likely to carry over to DBE recertification reviews:

  • Vague or generalized allegations
  • Lack of dates, names, and decision‑makers
  • No comparison to similarly situated non‑disadvantaged firms
  • Failure to quantify economic or professional harm
  • Isolated incidents with no lasting or cumulative impact

Certifiers are trained to discount narratives that rely on conclusions rather than evidence.


Drafting With Uncertainty in Mind—but Strategy in Hand

Because DBEs are among the first to undergo recertification under this new framework, precision matters more than ever. Until DBE‑specific decision patterns emerge, the safest approach is to draft Personal Narratives as if they were being evaluated under the 8(a) analytical model.

That means:

  • Treating each narrative as a legal showing, not a personal statement
  • Explaining not just what happened, but why it mattered
  • Demonstrating how past barriers continue to affect present business operations

Every incident described should end by answering a single question:
How did this make it harder for my business to compete on equal footing?


Closing Thought: Certifiers Evaluate Proof, Not Intent

DBE recertification under individualized disadvantage is new terrain, but certifier methodology is not. Government reviewers are trained to weigh evidence, test assumptions, and eliminate alternative explanations.

Until the DBE program develops its own body of precedent, the 8(a) program offers a valuable preview of how Personal Narratives are likely to be read—and why many will fail unless carefully drafted.

DBEs who understand this now are far better positioned to survive recertification later.


Need help?

An experienced advisor can help frame your narrative, organize proof, and ensure your experiences align with certifier expectations. Susan Dawson of Navigant Law Group focuses on certification, compliance, and growth strategy for DBEs, WBEs, and MBEs, regularly speaking and teaching on certification readiness and supplier diversity. Contact us at hello@navigantlaw.com for more information on how Navigant Law Group can help simplify your recertification process.

At Navigant Law Group, we know the ropes of the legal system. Business services include Contract Law, Employment Law, Succession Planning, WBE / MBE / VBE / LGBTBE / DBE certification, Commercial Real Estate, and other general Business Law services. Individual services include Estate Planning, Wills and Trusts, Administration, Probate, and Guardianship. 

Our attorneys’ unparalleled focus on goal-oriented, detailed planning and advice will have your ship shape in no time. Come chart your course with Navigant Law Group, LLC! 

This article constitutes attorney advertising. The material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.